🏆 Mini Computer World Cup – Grup B Match 19: Tinker Board vs LattePanda
Final Score: LattePanda – 3 | Tinker Board – 1
As Group B neared its conclusion, Match 19 brought together two innovative boards with distinct strengths: Tinker Board, a multimedia powerhouse, and LattePanda, a hybrid x86 platform with integrated maker features. Despite Tinker Board’s strong opening, LattePanda secured a convincing 3-1 victory.
---
⚙️ Pre-Match Overview
LattePanda stands out with its Intel Atom or Core m3 processor, 4–8 GB RAM, and built-in Arduino co-processor, making it uniquely capable of running full Windows 10/11 while interfacing with sensors and actuators for hardware projects.
Tinker Board, powered by the Rockchip RK3288 quad-core CPU and Mali-T764 GPU, features 2 GB RAM, 40-pin GPIO, and excellent 4K video playback, catering to makers focused on media-rich applications.
---
🕹️ Match Highlights
The match started with Tinker Board taking the lead in multimedia performance. Its Mali GPU rendered OpenGL demos and 1080p playback flawlessly, while its HDMI audio output delivered superior clarity.
However, LattePanda equalized quickly in general computing performance. Running Windows 10, it easily multitasked across Visual Studio, web browsers, and CAD software — tasks that Tinker Board couldn’t handle natively due to its ARM-based architecture.
In the maker integration round, LattePanda’s built-in Arduino Leonardo chip gave it a decisive advantage. By simultaneously running PC applications and controlling hardware sensors without additional boards, it scored its second goal.
Thermal performance played a critical role in the second half. While Tinker Board began to throttle under extended GPU loads, LattePanda maintained stable speeds, particularly in CPU-intensive workloads. This allowed LattePanda to score a third goal during the real-world productivity test, where it encoded video faster and executed complex spreadsheets with ease.
Tinker Board, though losing momentum, remained efficient in power consumption and GPIO latency, but these strengths weren’t enough to close the gap.
---
🔍 Performance Summary:
Multimedia: Tinker Board excelled in GPU-heavy tasks but couldn’t sustain performance.
General Computing: LattePanda dominated thanks to x86 architecture.
Maker Features: Arduino co-processor made LattePanda uniquely versatile.
Thermals: LattePanda stayed stable, while Tinker Board throttled slightly.
Power Efficiency: Tinker Board consumed less energy, but performance lagged.
---
🏁 Final Verdict
LattePanda wins 3-1, proving that hybrid computing power can outperform specialized multimedia boards in diverse workloads. Tinker Board remains a strong choice for GPU-intensive maker projects, but it couldn’t match LattePanda’s desktop-class software compatibility and hardware integration.
This result strengthens LattePanda’s push for the knockout stage, while Tinker Board faces a more challenging path forward.